branding scropianas

Branding Scorpions  as  Bad

. If you look at the general descriptions of what a Leo or a Taurus is, or break it down into Taurus man/woman, you get a mish-mash of positive and negative traits that generally round out to a fair personality set. From there, we get the stereotypes: Leos are passionate leaders. Tauruses are lazy but romantic lovers. Cancers are peacemakers.

Now look at Scorpio. Words that will come up often are ‘manipulative’, ‘seductive’, ‘mysterious’, ‘vindictive’. They’re depicted as dark characters who let their minds wander into unpleasant places. They have few friends. They’re insincere. They play mind games. They keep their cards close and don’t let anyone inside. They’re really great at sex and sensuality, innately, naturally, never need to be taught, and they use that as a weapon if needed. They sate their own needs, and don’t care much about their partner. The best way to make a relationship work with a Scorpio is long-distance. They can cut you off at any time and don’t need to give you a reason. They harbour long grudges and remember little slights.

The thing is that these readings are supposed to be loose enough to fit everyone who falls under their banner, and you’re dealing with millions of people being branded like this for the circumstance of their birth-month. If you take a ‘Taurus’ and a ‘Scorpio’ and analyze them as people, they might have the same sexual expression and the same sexual urges, but one horoscope depicts that as the sign of an immaculate lover, and the other depicts that as the sign of a carnal temptress seeking to drag their prey down into the dark. If you analyze two ‘Scorpios’ down at their individual personality level, you might have a confident, sporty character who wins all the scholarships, and a quiet, artistic sort with a small community of friends, and if you looked at their characteristics alone, you might peg them as a Leo and an Aquarius, or whatever characteristics you select down to determine. If you meet 30 people in a room, and you don’t know a thing about their birthday, you can tell that some of them are extroverted or introverted, some of them friendly or shy or uninterested, some of them athletic, bookish, or both, and so on, but you cannot derive from those presentations their star signs or the traits that they’re ‘supposed’ to be attached to. When we give characters birthdates and star signs, we’re selecting based on the personalities already attached, confirming those stereotypes out of expediency, but the same isn’t true for real life.

Everyone has the capacity to be petty, vengeful, sexual, emotionally cold, intelligent, manipulative, or insincere. It’s just the Scorpio sign that’s set apart requiring its members to take on the reputation and the burden of those traits, and that’s not fair. Lets  stop  branding based  on  popular  readings  based  on  western concept like so  called  popular   “ linda  good man”  and     western  way  of looking  at  astrology  and  Branding ,,,,